To see a list of the Democrats who
allowed the Greedy Old Plutocrats to hose you for Christmas Click Here!
Featuring the essays and political comments of Steve McKeand (SCM). Take the tour, click on "Ouotes" and other page labels.
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Hosed For Christmas
The Republicans and the Democrats who
appeased the Republicans gave lavish Christmas presents to just about
everyone who can afford to buy elected office holders. The lavish
gifts the oligopoly received were neatly wrapped in the CRomnibus and
were purchased at your expense; which means Congress hosed you for
Christmas! Some of you ( particularly poor children) always get hosed worse than the rest of us do. A partial list
of who is getting reamed the hardest includes Truck Drivers, College
Students, Anyone Who Has Blue Shield or Blue Cross Health Insurance,
And Children Who Eat In School Cafeterias or Depend On Food Aid.
Monday, December 15, 2014
Losers
The poison pills the Republicans
embedded in the, so called, CRomnibus budget will make the American
people the biggest losers for all the reasons I gave in my previous
post. The individual politicians who are going to lose the most
because of this bill are Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton.
When the big banks crash our economy
again and we have to bail them out again historians will point out
that Mr. Obama lacked the courage to prevent the big banks from
engaging in the risky behavior that caused the crash. I do not know
what Mr. Obama thinks he got in the budget bill that could possibly
be worth the damage it is doing to his reputation. This does not
bode well for the future! I hate to think about what President
Milquetoast will allow the Greedy Old Plutocrats to do to the
American people over the next two years.
If I were Hillary Clinton I would be
fighting mad at President Obama and the other Democrats who voted for
CRomnibus, because the poison pills embedded in that bill,
particularly the one gutting Dodd-Frank, greatly magnify the danger
of her ties to Wall Street and the big financial institutions.
Believe me, it is not just liberal Democrats who are leery of Hillary
because of those ties! Now she will have to anger her largest
contributors by saying she will restore the provision of Dodd-Frank
that prohibited the FDIC from insuring derivatives or she will have
to acquiesce to the FDIC insuring the risky behavior of the big banks
and thereby anger everyone who is smart enough to understand the
causes of George W. Bush's recession. The CRomnibus has really put
her in a difficult position!
The only bright side to this
abomination (I am so angry I almost wrote Obamanation) is the courage
of Elizabeth Warren and the others who risked incurring the wrath of
the leaders of their party by opposing CRomnibus.
Saturday, December 13, 2014
Fight Back!
I am so angry I want to give all but
139 members of congress the finger and piss in their eyes. The
Republicans buried in the budget bill passed by the house enough
poison pills to place our economy in grave peril. One poison pill
allows corporations to avoid still more taxes through overseas
investments; another increases the power of money by raising the
limits on how much a person or company can contribute to a political
candidate's campaign. By far the most dangerous and egregious of the
poison pills, however, is the one written by Citibank. This poison
pill threatens our economy by forcing the FDIC to insure derivatives.
What this means is that the same banks that crashed our economy
under Bush can reap all the benefits of taking the same risks they took
back then, and when those investments go sour, as they did under
Bush, we will have to bail them out again! This is the
Republican Party's recycling plan; we are forced to eat shit while
the oligopoly feasts on anything and everything of any value. The
only reason why I cannot call those poison pills class warfare is because no one is
fighting back. President Obama and the other Democratic appeasers
simply do not have the will or courage to defend a middle-class
(mainly white) that is too stupid to recognize and oppose its enemy.
This does not portend well for the future. Is there anyone who can and will prevent the middle-class from going the way of the Dodo Bird?
Thus far, I have viewed Elizabeth
Warren as a wonderful and valuable gadfly. But the weakness of the
Democrats and the unconscionable efforts of the Republicans to
satiate an oligopoly that is insatiably greedy have made me change my view of Ms Warren. The middle ground has become quick sand. I am now on the Warren for President band
wagon.
WE DESPERATELY NEED AN ECONOMIC
WARRIOR WHO WILL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO PROTECT US FROM THE
INSATIABLE GREED OF THE OLIGOPOLY! GO ELIZABETH!
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Well, Excuse You!
“BEFORE
President George W. Bush left office, a group of conservatives
lobbied the
White House to grant pardons to the officials who had planned and
authorized the United States torture program. My organization, the
American Civil Liberties Union, found the proposal repugnant. Along
with eight other human rights groups, we sent a letter to Mr. Bush
arguing that granting pardons would undermine the rule of law and
prevent Americans from learning what had been done in their names.
But
with the impending
release of
the report from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, I have
come to think that President Obama should issue pardons, after all —
because it may be the only way to establish, once and for all, that
torture is illegal.”
The
forgoing quotation is from a brilliant Op Ed in the New York times by
Anthony D. Romero in which Mr. Romero argues that President Obama
should issue explicit pardons to George W. Bush and those who
tortured rather than letting what amounts to tacit pardons stand .
What Mr. Romero is advocating is a bit like saying “Well, excuse
you!” to a quest who farted at the dinner table, only the offenses committed by Bush and the torturers rise to the level of crimes,
and the pardons recognize the criminality of those acts (click here).
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Cops And Race
Thus far I have avoided commenting on
the shooting of Michael Brown and the subsequent events in Ferguson
Missouri because so many people were saying so much about it that I
did not see where I had anything to add. Obviously the shooting of
an unarmed black man by a white police officer is going to raise
questions about the racial attitudes of that officer, and the almost
military response to protests are going to raise questions about the
racial attitude of the entire police department. The recent rash
of incidents in which police officers have killed unarmed black men
is a rude awakening; it says we have not made as much progress as we
thought we had in regard to racism.
I should like to point out, however,
that the use of excessive force by police officers is not strictly a
racial issue. I will grant you that black men are far more likely to be beaten or shot by police officers than are white men, but I can think
of at least three fairly recent instances where police officers have
used excessive force against white men. One of those instances
happened close to home when sheriff's deputies sadistically beat and
tased a man to death for running a stop sign and being frighteningly
large. In fact, anyone who has studied it will tell you that law
enforcement officers are macho guys who live in a dangerous physical
world. They have to use force far too often, and they will get out
of hand if you do not keep an eye on them. While I certainly do not
want to unreasonably increase the risks they face every day, I do
think that we often give them too much leeway in regard to not
holding them accountable when they go too far! Policies, procedures,
and behavior should be reviewed frequently, and in the case of
departments where there are too many instances of questionable
behavior on the part of its officers some outside agency should be
called in investigate and make changes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)